Atrocities of Occupying State Isreal Within West Asia.
The History of the Creation of Hamas and Israel's Collusion with
Hamas for Its Political Strategies and Expansion Ambitions
Israel’s political design of manipulating Palestinian militant factions to advance its ambition of sole dominance and territorial expansion was seeded far earlier than imagined—already in the era of the First Aliyah, between 1882 and 1903. From that moment onward, as the Zionist project unfolded since 1904, the ancestral inhabitants, the Palestinians, have been ensnared in an unrelenting quagmire of dispossession, nightmarish upheaval, and generational suffering that endures to this very day.
Sheikh Ahmad Yasin, the Muslim Brotherhood leader in Gaza—where hundreds of thousands of 1948 Nakba refugees remained trapped—built a vast network of Islamic schools, mosques, and social welfare societies. Israel, determined to fracture Palestinian unity, deliberately schemed to weaken the secular nationalist Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In pursuit of its expansionist zeal, Zionist authorities reached out to Sheikh Yasin, calculating that a strong and unified PLO could foster genuine peace, but would obstruct Israel’s relentless drive for dominance. Thus, Palestinian suffering was deepened not only by dispossession, but by Israel’s cynical manipulation of internal divisions to perpetuate its control.
Israel actively encouraged the growth of Sheikh Ahmad Yasin’s network during the early stages of the First Intifada, knowing full well that it would evolve into Hamas—Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya (Islamic Resistance Movement). Yasin himself, a quadriplegic and half-blind refugee from Gaza, built his movement under the guise of charity for displaced Palestinians, while Israel covertly enabled its rise to fracture Palestinian unity. Claims that Iranian support could have sustained a Sunni militant group for secular reasons were implausible; the decisive hand was Israel’s. Though Israel publicly distanced itself after Hamas’s attacks in 1989, its pattern of airstrikes, assassinations, and blockade paradoxically strengthened the group’s legitimacy. More sinister still, Israeli authorities have continued to deliberately preserve Hamas’s presence, ensuring Gaza remains a perpetual battleground. For Israel, a Hamas-free Gaza would remove the pretext for its campaigns of devastation—campaigns seen as necessary stepping stones toward the vision of a Greater Israel stretching across ancient Canaan. In this calculated strategy, Palestinian suffering has been not incidental, but instrumental.”
By this maneuvering, Israel has deliberately secured a pretext to avoid meaningful negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, claiming that the Authority does not represent all Palestinians. In the late 2010s and early 2020s, Israeli officials themselves facilitated this fragmentation by encouraging Qatar to channel aid to Hamas and by approving the transfer of Qatari funds directly to the organization. This policy created a dual Palestinian leadership, weakening the Authority’s legitimacy while strengthening Hamas as a rival interlocutor.
The duplicity became evident during the 12‑day war of June 2025, when the Emir of Qatar openly boasted that his government had financed Hamas through Israel’s own mechanisms. At the same time, U.S. forces stationed in Qatar launched strikes against Iran. Qatar assumed that its prior funding of Hamas would shield it from Iranian retaliation, expecting Tehran to dilute its offensive. Yet what Qatar failed to grasp was that its role as financier was no secret; it was known to all but concealed by the Sheikhs themselves. Iran, calculating both humanitarian considerations and strategic necessity, limited its precision strikes to U.S. base locations, sparing broader Qatari targets.
Thus, Israel’s orchestration of Qatari support for Hamas served a dual purpose: it entrenched Palestinian division, undermining the Authority’s claim to represent its people, and it provided Israel with a convenient alibi to indefinitely postpone negotiations. The episode illustrates how external actors were manipulated into sustaining a cycle of fragmentation and conflict, while Israel maintained diplomatic cover under the guise of Palestinian disunity.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cloaked the transfer of Qatari aid in humanitarian rhetoric, yet Israeli intelligence itself later admitted that this money contributed to the success of the October 7 attacks. This duplicity became a convenient narrative for Israel abroad, while locally it masked a destructive strategy. Even Israel’s own press has exposed the truth: Haaretz condemned Netanyahu’s ‘warped political doctrine’ of deliberately strengthening Hamas at the expense of the Palestinian Authority, a policy that entrenched division and undermined any chance of peace.
Another Haaretz column went further, describing how the Netanyahu–Hamas ‘alliance’ and the October 7 pogrom served to preserve his grip on power. The Times of Israel, a more conservative outlet, likewise acknowledged the folly: ‘For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces.’ These admissions reveal a chilling reality—Israel’s leadership knowingly empowered Hamas, not out of humanitarian concern, but as a calculated tool to weaken Palestinian unity, perpetuate conflict, and justify its own expansionist agenda. The cost has been borne entirely by Palestinians, whose suffering is prolonged by a policy that treats their dispossession as a political instrument.”
Meanwhile,
as former IDF member Bernzi Sanders explains, Netanyahu’s new bombing campaign
and expanding ground offensive will only
continue to strengthen and perpetuate Hamas — and stave off a just resolution
to this crisis.
Netanyahu gloated in a 2019 Likud party meeting to his compatriots: “Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy — to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.” Hamas has become a convenient foe for Israel, in contrast with the diplomatic success of the Palestinian Authority during the 1990s. In a 2015 interview, Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich explained that Hamas’s militancy, and therefore its illegitimacy on the world stage, was a boon for his government’s political strategy.
“The Palestinian Authority is a burden, and Hamas is an asset,” Smotrich said. “It’s a terrorist organization, no one will recognize it, no one will give it status at the [International Criminal Court], no one will let it put forth a resolution at the U.N. Security Council.”
Indeed,
Netanyahu has been intent on keeping the Palestinians divided under two ruling
groups: the diplomatically successful Palestinian Authority in the West Bank
and the militant Hamas in Gaza. (The Palestinian Authority, led by the vestiges
of the PLO, was created as
an interim self-governing body meant
to pave the way for an independent Palestinian state, but that has not
happened.)
Since
2009, Netanyahu’s political strategy has revolved around keeping Hamas alive
and kicking — even if it hurts his “chosen land people.” While Israel and Netanyahu give lip service on the international stage in
seeking a two-state solution, Hamas provides a convenient excuse to avoid
pursuing one. T All Islamic countries foresaw the
danger of Israeli ambitions and understood that the two-state solution wouldn’t
bring viable peace in the Middle East unless the impunity enjoyed by Israelis is
curbed by some means.
The
Israeli Head of Religious Affairs in Gaza, Avner Cohen, described the Israeli
action in a 2009 Wall Street Journal article called “How
Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas.”
“Hamas,
to my great regret, is Israel’s creation.”
Now
that is clear that October 7th 2023 holocaust which Israel itself allowed Hamas
to run its way of horrendous, the magnitude of which Israel prefers to call it
as holocaust within its territory without any resistance, as a
"prerequisite justification" for the eliciting of the ethnic cleansing
to follow, that began within days and continues to date. All at the concurrent
commitment of those countries, who fund and empower the Israeli government with
heavily destructive weapons, including access to nuclear ammunition freely, at the
behest of those countries' current leadership's religious fanatical beliefs as
a tool for their greedy hegemonic intentions over the resources of Middle East
countries.
As
already planned, invariably all Western propaganda machines, CNN, Fox, BBC, etc,
interviewed the Palestinian leaders during that week, and all those media began
the conversation with invariably the same one question, “Do you condemn(ed) the
7th October Holocaust?" What a
coordinated effort it was! Therefore, Israel is an agent in the Middle East, to
implement the hegemonic policy of the West to the tune of religious fanaticism
in Israel. Israel's negligence towards its
people - people of the so-called chosen land, who Israel Itself allowed to be
captured by Hamas - never prioritized getting the release of those from Hamas,
why should they - when they cunningly foresaw such a release effort would
drastically hinder the rapidity of the destruction and demolition in rendering Gaza
land to be unfit for living anybody, but for Trump's Golf Course. This attitude
of Israel and its allies cannot be explained other than by a modus operandi via
the demolition of Hamas for the Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians.
All these cascading chains of unpeaceful or rather volatile reactions are offshoots of the British Empire establishing Israel as a State for Jews, with the clear intention of future expansion, beginning with arrogantly chasing out 700,000 Palestinians in 1948, already inhabitants of a Peaceful State of Palestine since the Ottoman Empire period.
After this expulsion of 700,000 Palestinians, Zionists posed the question of why Arab Countries did not open the door for the expelled people, what an arrogant program to relieve the primitiveness, despite knowing that the City of Jerusalem is believed to be a Holy City for three different religious groups, Christians, Islamic and later for Jews who believes Judaism it is an absolute fanaticism of uncivilized. Why not make Israel live in coexistence with others? Impunity conferred on Israel has proven otherwise for 78 long years. Israel's pretentious fear since its inception does not mean its neighbours are aggressors.
A Palestinian wearing a shirt with "1948 during the Pope's Visit to Palestine and the declaration of State Palestine.
Let Kindness, Love, and compassion prevail so
that peace can prosper on Earth.
